Stating The Obvious 0366 – Eight Years Of Calling White People Racist Has Consequences. #TheTrumpening
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
For eight years SJWs and the left-wing statists have screamed “racist, sexist, homophobic” at anyone who dares to disagree with their policies. Because if you disagree with a leftist you aren’t tolerant, diverse and multicultural like they are.
Did I mention consequences?
Welcome to the consequences.
While the alt-right and the man-o-sphere would like to take credit for a Trump victory the numbers tell a different story.
The same number of people who voted Republican this election voted Republican in the previous two elections.
What changed? In 2008 and additional 9 million people voted for Obama. In 2012 and additional 6 million people voted for Obama.
Where were those 9 million people when Hillary Cuntlin needed them?
- Were they Bernie supports who sat out the election?
- Are they sexist?
- Were they too stoned to know it was election day?
- Were they distracted by trying to figure out what gender they are?
- Are they too lazy to vote?
- Are they so entitled that the idea of not getting their way all the time never even occurred to them?
Trump won despite:
- 70% of the population being parasites.
- The entire main stream media being against him.
- Google censoring search results to favour Hillary.
- Feministbook, CensorTube and all the other social media censoring right-wing posts.
- The banks, military-industrial complex and health insurance companies supporting Hillary.
- White people being called racist from every side. In the media, on the internet and in person.
Now that The Trumpening has begun will you leave the United States and go to Canada? No. Because moving to Canada will require work.
Never has any event in the history of the United States (other than when Democrats formed the KKK) revealed so much about the world view of the left-wing statist liberal Democrat. They are:
- Lazy.
- Stupid.
- Unable to grasp that the cosmos is not obligated to never hurt their feelings.
Hillary supporters – you still have an opportunity to Make America Great Again. You can get the fuck out.
In the “Nothing Unexpected Department”:
Source Material For This Podcast:
http://www.politico.com/2016-election/results/map/president
http://www.cnn.com/election/results
http://www.cnn.com/election/results/exit-polls/national/president
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2016
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0781450.html
http://ropercenter.cornell.edu/polls/us-elections/popular-vote/
Discover more from Cynical Libertarian Society
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.
The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.
Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.
Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a cellphone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.
The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.
Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.
Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.
Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?
Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.
If there is no victim, there is no crime.
We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.
Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.
Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?
Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of freedom?
Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?
If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.
If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.
If you allow others to swear then you can, too.
If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.
Who wants to live in a prison?
Think. Question everything.
A former coworker on facebook wrote that it was very telling that Trump was the favorite of counties with the lowest levels of bachelors degrees among voters. Never a good tactic to use against me and my ideas. Implying that you’d have to be stupid and/or uneducated to support him. I replied with “Grab yourself by the pussy and get a grip!” and she had the ass to accuse ME of “being rude”.
I have said for many years “there are some things so stupid you have to go to college to believe them”. A Hillary Klinton presidency would be one of those things.