Stating The Obvious 0233 – A Discussion About “People Should Not Be Allowed Unlimited Freedom” by RooshV. – Part 2

More on why the internet limits freedom and enhances oppression.

How To Make The Perfect Pot Of Tea by Roosh V. – http://www.rooshv.com/how-to-make-the-perfect-pot-of-tea

In thinking about my response to this article by Roosh (not the one on tea, the one on personal freedom) I found I had to specifically differentiate a femistatist from a statists so that I could classify Roosh as statist or femistatist.

A statist is: A person who violates the zero aggression principle or violates the ownership of property by others.

A femistatist is: A person who violates the zero aggression principle or violates the ownership of property by others and places an emphasis on initiating this aggression against and theft from heterosexual white men who work for living by creating value for other people.

I finish off this descent into statism in which Roosh puts forth these freedom hating ideas in his attempt to circumvent natural selection and keep the stupid people alive so they can keep breeding.

Most humans are not capable of wisely using their freedom, and so they must be restrained and managed by rules or by those who know what’s best for that individual more than the individual himself. . . . Unless people are limited in the personal decisions they’re able to make, they will continue to hurt themselves and others.

http://www.rooshv.com/people-should-not-be-allowed-unlimited-personal-freedom

Yet notice that when people in the government hurt others Roosh seems to have no problem with that. Not only should people in the government hurt others and be rewarded for it, but people in the government should make your decisions for you as well. They know what’s best for you.

It’s for your own good after all . . .